Our research has been or is currently funded by ASABAXA Research FundBBSRC, GCRFNERCThe Centre for Ecology and Evolution (London), The Leverhulme TrustThe Royal SocietyThe Royal Veterinary College (London), and Swansea University.

Sociality

 

Individuals interact. We use direct observations and high-resolution tracking of individuals, combined with mathematical simulations or agent-based models, to study the mechanisms, adaptive value, and flexibility of social behaviour. Much of this work is conducted with populations of wild chacma baboons in Namibia and South Africa. Testing and refining methodological and analytical approaches is also important to this work. For a summary of the approach we take, see King et al. (2018).

 

Heterogeneity

 

Phenotypic differences among individuals drives the behaviour, structure, and functioning of animal groups. We aim to understand this individual heterogeneity and its social, ecological, and evolutionary consequences. To achieve this aim, we study personality and plasticity of social fish and birds in the lab. For a review of this topic, see Jolles et al. (2019).

 

Organisation

 

We investigate how animal behaviour is organised in space and time. Much of our work in this area has a strong applied theme. For example, we have developed tools for assessing the scale and nature of N pollution arising from sheep-grazed pastures, shown that ocean acidification does not cause behavioural alterations in fish, and described adaptive space-use by baboons in response to management interventions in Cape Town.

 

And Leadership

 

Groups of animals need to make collective decisions about what to do and when to do it, if they are to remain as a cohesive group. We study the various ways such group decisions can be made and are particularly interested in how leadership has evolved as a fundamental means to solve coordination problems and resolve within-group conflict of interest. We have studied leadership and group decisions in fish, sheep, goats, African wild dogs, baboons, and humans. For a short review on leadership, see King et al. (2009).